Astrid Keßler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> As I say there, I don't have any problem with making an exception to our >> policy, or even removing the policy entirely. But the policy does keep us >> from getting a flood of "please add our type" messages. (We already get a >> substantial number.) > >> Opinions? > > Our policy is really ok. It is not too difficult to add additional types > to the configuration (whereever they want). It seems a lot of people are > thinking, it is a bug if they have to configure their server. > <exaggerated>And we would not need AddType if we put all and everything > to the default mime.types.</exaggerated>
+1. I don't want to see our config file cluttered with lots of 'x-' types. If it is very popular, it should be registered as non 'x-' types. We don't have problem with accepting those official types. If we accept one 'x-' type, it would become harder to reject other private types. It will eventually lead to conflicts of private types. I don't think we should spend time discussing which private types to keep in our config. Don't accpet any private MIME type is really a good policy, I believe. Just my 2 yen. -- Yoshiki Hayashi --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
