On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Yoshiki Hayashi wrote: > It is true that the document itself looks a bit old, though. > There is an obsolete comment mentioning ServerType > directive. Perhaps 'child' should be changed to 'worker' > since 'child' implies fork/exec. But other than that, > mod_status file looks fine to me. Is it OK to change them > (remove <note> about standalone mode and inet mode and do > s/child/worker/) and remove warning at the top of the > document?
+1 I went through and added that warning to a bunch of docs before 2.0 was released. Essentially anything that I thought had substantially changed, but I hadn't had a chance to check in detail, got the warning. Joshua. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
