I finally got around to review and commit this patch ;-P Thanks for the patience, Colm.
Btw, I also fixed some typos in your original patch, at least I think I did so:
- "Allthough..." -> "Although..."
- "possiblity" -> "possibility"
- "apache" -> "Apache"
- "suexec" -> "suEXEC" (where applicable)
- "...to run as;" -> "to run as:"
- "webserver" -> "web-server" (to be consistent with the rest of the doc)
plus some cosmetic fixes / clean-ups in the whole xml source to keep the docs consistent (mostly <code>...</code>, formatting etc.) ;)
Cheers, Erik
On 28/09/2003, at 09:10, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 03:03:30PM -0400, Cliff Woolley wrote:On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
The resends are not a bother. :) Should this change go in both 2.0 and
2.1 or just 2.1? I don't happen to remember whether the change it goes
with was backported or not.
sorry, just 2.1 :)
Okay, that's what I did. So AFAIK all the patches you've (re)submitted
are now committed to the right branches... thanks!
That they are :) *does cvs diff* , this one is much less important (in fact the only thing actually wrong in the doc is the paths), but I'll resubmit it anyway:
<snipped the patch />
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
