* "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was experimenting, since Rich Bowen made an interesting point at the > con that our mozilla friends' browser prefers xml over html, what would > happen if I retrieved /docs-2.0/mod/mod_dav.xml. I was pleasantly > surprised but noticed that the example config block wasn't parsed > correctly.
We don't support the xml urls. For reasons, see below. > It seems our example config blocks aren't correctly formatted (they wrap > ignoring newlines in pre blocks, apparently.) Is there an elegant fixup > to allow this to display correctly in both html and xml flavors? It would > be very trivial to add the xml variants to the typemap file, as well. It's a mozilla problem. Mozilla is unsusable as an xml/xslt browser (Try, for example, reading a german file, mozilla will bail because of entities it doesn't *want* to read). However, in IE it works like a charm, but I don't care, because I don't use that software ;-) Additionally examples are *not* <pre>-formatted(due to the potential problems of <pre>, there's also an archive discussion somewhere, about a year old or so), but formatted with simple <br />s (Still not all, but this the aim is on my TODO). I'm tired of trying to support that broken mozilla-xml stuff, sorry. There's no reasonable way to convince mozilla to render correctly other than html. nd --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
