On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I followed the link to the <Limit> container and, interestingly enough, > the description of this container explicitly warns (!) not to use <Limit> > as an access control mechanism because <LimitExcept> should be > preferred...?
[I don't usually read these, but...] Yes, this is an error in the english original. It should refer to mod_access, not to <limit>. A little history-check shows that it's been that way since the original cvs import of the docs in 1996. Joshua. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
