On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, David J Andersson wrote: > like > > Require valid-group > > is what I am missing hence there is a > > Require valid-user
Surely if you're a member of a valid group, that implies that you're a valid user? Dunno, perhaps the reverse is not the case. Anyways, the answer to your question, and all "why isn't this feature implemented" questions like it, is that nobody thought it was a good enough idea to code it up. If you do feel that it is, then feel free to submit a patch implementing it. Can you describe a scenario in which this would be useful? > > * "David J Andersson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> I've just read the manual and I'm boggled. > >> The following URL http://httpd.apache.org/docs/mod/core.html#require > >> shows 5 valid syntaxes but I miss the sixth one 'valid-group' why is > >> it that this option is excluded? > > > > What would be the semantics? All user, belonging to all groups in > > AuthGroupFile? > > > > Such a thing is not implemented (and would be fairly slow). > > > > nd > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To > > unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Med v�nliga h�lsningar > > David J Andersson > Lignagatan 7, 2tr > 117 34 Stockholm > E-post: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Tel: 08 - 668 64 89 > GSM: 0703 - 94 56 61 > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- Pilgrim, how you journey on the road you chose To find out where the winds die and where the stories go --Pilgrim (Enya - A Day Without Rain) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
