> We could consider trying to help more people find the alternative formats. > It seems that most windows users would be better off with the chm than > with the format that comes with apache. And I'm still wondering if we > would be better off distributing the docs entirely separately from the > code.
nd and I discussed this point several times. There are a lot of advantages distributing the documentation seperately. - The code distribution will be much smaler. - Most people do not need all languages. - A lot of admins do not install/want/need the documentation on production machines. ... and other advantages. But we have one problem: we do not have an offline html documentation. Our docs need a properly installed server. So we have to build offline html documents or we have to offer an installation skript if we want to distribute the documentation seperately. Kess --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
