* Mladen Turk wrote:
> Astrid Ke�ler wrote:
> > Mladen, I think there is a big misunderstanding about the docs, the
> > xml-files and the build process. We do _not_ style our documents
> > graphically when writing the xml documents. We only write content.
> > Layout is done during the build process. And it is done globally for
> > the whole domument.
> >
> > What you did here - with best intention, sure - is trying to force a
> > specific layout by breaking semantics. Please don't do this. Don't try
> > to outwit the build process.
> > If you don't like the layout, then this is worth a discusion. Suggest a
> > better layout. But please, don't do such tricky things.
>
> Well, take a look at ssl. I didn't do nothing more.
These huge <pre> sections in mod_ssl docs are a bad example, because they're
simply not revised yet. I'm wondering why I've spent my evening with saying
"Please ask if you don't know" all the time. *sigh*
> And once again. Those are *not* tables with some data,
> but rather formated code. It only happens that they looks like tables.
There's no code. It's just a table of values. Or wouldn't you say, that
a b c d e
/--------------
x | 0 1 2 3 4
y | 0 1 4 9 16
is a table? Try a voice browser. *I* would give up after listening to the
first line.
nd
--
"Solides und umfangreiches Buch"
-- aus einer Rezension
<http://pub.perlig.de/books.html#apache2>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
