Astrid Keßler wrote: > Not sure, but didn't we had a similar discussion some time ago? I can't > find it now. :/
Yes, we've had this conversation a number of times, and each time agreed (or at least majority) that it was a good idea. > Like Joshua I am against changing the URLs. We have docs-2.0 and docs-2.1 > they are really fine. No need to change them. Well, having a dozen top-level documentation directories in version 2.12.0 will be kind of annoying, I think. > I'm a litte bit unhappy only with 1.3 and could live with a change to > docs-1.3. This would fit the namespace and would give us the possibility > to add some extra information at /docs. We do not need a script to lead > the people to the new urls. httpd itself can do this. > > The only advantage, a CGI-script would have, is that it could do some > search over all doc versions and offer choices. I think, this is > something, google (or some other search engine) can do as well. Let's > use the existing resources. Yes. That's what the script does. That's why it's a script and not just a series of rewrite rules. It is doing translations (like mod_imap to mod_imagemap) as well as detecting modules that no longer exist (mod_auth_db). --Rich --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
