Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 11:53:43AM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
This leaves the question about what to do with the trunk documentation.
Should http://httpd.apache.org/docs/trunk/ be made work perpetually?
Or should the manual from trunk simply never be on-line?
I vote for /docs/trunk/ always pointing to the current trunk.
--1 ... it should point to the current stable shipping version, e.g.
Why would trunk point to the current stable shipping version?
D'uh oh(!) Yes, a /docs/trunk/ isn't a bad idea. I shortened that as
I read it, and thought you were speaking of /docs/ (vanilla).
"Hey user, THIS is the version you should be using already, but here are
the links to old versions and current experimental branch".
Right now, we have two experimental branches. This is the problem.
But we have /docs/2.1/ (which should be /docs/2.2/ IMHO) - right? That
solves the issue?
Bill
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
