Re: Backport policy for docs?

[Sander Temme]

On Jun 11, 2006, at 3:10 PM, noodl wrote:

On 6/11/06, Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

On 6/11/06, Sander Temme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> like to backport r409455 from trunk to 2.2.
>
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/mod/
> mod_proxy.xml?r1=395228&r2=409455


might want to consult the list for something very major; the patch
above certainly wouldn't qualify as major).

> Do we have a backport policy for documentation? I specifically would The policy is: fire away. No need for votes or anything (although you

If you do, could I suggest that "Otherwise the resulting requests to
the backend may miss some needed slashes and do not deliver the
expected results." isn't gramatically correct? Drop the 'do', perhaps.

S.

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]              http://www.temme.net/sander/
PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4  B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF

Good point. I'll try to reformulate that into a little bit more formal language if I have a moment to meditate.

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature