On 8/8/06, Tony Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all, I am looking at the FAQ for 2.2, and looking back at the old 1.3 version for a comparison. I will submit some patches and updates for the 2.2 version shortly, but I wanted to gauge opinion first. I like the way that the 1.3 FAQ was broken down into more topics/categories, and I think this helps people who are looking in a certain topic range. Specifically things like: Building, and Installation Configuration Error Log Features (SSI, ModRewrite, SSL, etc) I already have a handful of items that can be broken down into these topics, and be added to the FAQ. A lot of these items have been gleamed from time in #apache, or within the course of my experimentation :) So thoughts, and comments appreciated.
Go for it. The 2.2 FAQ is certainly under-loved. One note: My philosophy is that the existence of a huge FAQ that must be read by every user is a symptom of insufficient or badly designed docs. The reason a question is frequently asked may be because the docs don't sufficiently cover the topic, or the topic is too hard to find in the docs. So I would prefer not to have an enormous FAQ with tons of text. Instead, I would favor restricting it to the most crucial and common questions, and answering them mainly by providing links into the main docs. Joshua. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
