On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 01:56:19AM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > We have a serious issue to determine, and I've asked for a 48 hour cooldown > of wiki.apache.org/httpd/ to make a decision, and in the meantime asked that > the wiki become read-only for the conclusion of this decision. > > [ ] Our httpd wiki is open to external resources for httpd. > [X] External httpd resources are prohibited. > > I mean this explicitly, obviously a link to MS/Sun/RedHat about their > specific platform would be genuinely useful and relevant.
Including that caveat, I'm in favour of keeping external httpd resources out. > I'm asking about askapache's external links, which have not been actually > contributed to the foundation. And we've never presumed that pointers to > external links are resources under the AL. If AskApache would like to contribute content - BRILLIANT! If they'd like to have their content on the wiki, but aren't sure how to wikify them, please, just license them right, and there are a bunch of active contributors who'll help get them up there. If AskApache just want extra traffic, I don't see that that's helpful or beneficial to us, or our users. > Once we determine a policy, I belive we owe megaspaz and AskApache a second > chance once they are informed of the definative policy. > > Future wiki abuse would, of course, lead to account and IP blockage. But > I believe at this moment both acted in best-faith without any guidance from > our project, and we need to have policies so folks can be responsible wiki > users. +1 > This isn't the end-all of all possibilities, but let's discuss for 2 days > and reopen the wiki with a concrete policy? > > Bill > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
