William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > What would folks say to renaming all occurances of "reverse proxy" > to say "gateway" in our documentation? > > We could leave one occurrence of "gateway (e.g. reverse-proxy as it was > previously documented)" per document, for clarification.
I am not sure that is a good idea see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reverse_proxy Cheers Jean-Frederic > > (I take no credit for the idea, only the complaint. Roy Fielding had > pointed out the correct answer to me over dinner last week. Thank him, > or blame me for dragging this issue back up.) > > Bill > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
