On 19/08/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Author: noodl
> Date: Sun Aug 19 09:53:23 2007
> New Revision: 567427
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=567427
> Log:
> backport r567426 (s/Domain/Path/ per Lucien GENTIS on docs@) to 2.2
>
> Modified:
>     httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/docs/manual/invoking.html.en
>     httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/docs/manual/invoking.xml
>

[snip]

> Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/docs/manual/invoking.xml
> URL: 
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/docs/manual/invoking.xml?view=diff&rev=567427&r1=567426&r2=567427
> ==============================================================================
> --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/docs/manual/invoking.xml (original)
> +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/docs/manual/invoking.xml Sun Aug 19 09:53:23 
> 2007
> @@ -84,9 +84,7 @@
>      immediately. This indicates that the server is up and running.
>      You can then use your browser to connect to the server and view
>      the test page in the <directive
> -    module="core">DocumentRoot</directive> directory
> -    and the local copy of the documentation linked from that
> -    page.</p>
> +    module="core">DocumentRoot</directive> directory.</p>
>  </section>
>
>  <section id="errors"><title>Errors During Start-up</title>


I screwed up and committed the wrong files by mistake during a
backport. The commit is valid, I'm fairly sure, but has the wrong
message. Should I:

 [] Revert (back-merge and recommit) it with the right message?
 [] Ignore it, as it's a simple change?

*crosses fingers*
*don't svn ci past midnight*

-- 
noodl

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to