* William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > From w3c's validater, > > 1. Error Line 3, Column 1: Missing xmlns attribute for element html. > The value should be: http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml. > > <html> > > Many Document Types based on XML need a mandatory xmlns="" on the root > element. For example, the root element for XHTML will look like: > <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xml:lang="en" lang="en"> > > I'm presuming this carries through to many of our docs (including the top > www.apache.org index page). > > Thoughts?
The browsers don't care very much about that, because it's delivered as text/html anyway. More interesting for revision are things like: * <menu> * using <a name""> with a syntax not usable for ids While you're at it, adding the xmlns doesn't do any harm. sure ;) nd --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
