On 31.08.2007, at 22:55, André Malo wrote:
* Vincent Bray wrote:
Is there any particular reason (aside from tedium) that common.xsl
still has 2006 for the copyright year? Building the whole of the docs
takes 1 min 7 secs with this change for me in trunk. Should I clean
out my changes in all branches, change common.xsl and commit?
I'm not sure about our current policy and how it applies to the
docs anyway.
Are the generated docs a complete document with one copyright? Does
every
document have its own?
IMO the sum of all docs represent a single publication with a single
copyright date which should be based on the latest change (think of a
book) and since we don't place any copyright dates into single files
anymore (as we did with the old license header [1]) I think we're
good with updating it now...
Though we might also want to update NOTICE [2] to carry the new date
(seems it wasn't updated yet for the releases in 2007, see my mail to
dev@) and maybe simply keep the docs in sync with that one ;-)
Cheers,
Erik
[1] Just compare the license headers in the following two files to
see what i mean:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/tags/2.2.2/include/
http_main.h
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/tags/2.2.3/include/
http_main.h
[2] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk/NOTICE
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
