Hy,I do know if you are talking about me,not responding but Iwas unable the "ant"with licences crash the computer and all 4000 emails where gone, ----- Original Message ----- From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 10:36 PM Subject: Re: Unless I'm terribly confused
> Vincent Bray wrote: > > On 31/12/2007, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> <Limit GET POST OPTIONS> > >> </Limit> > >> <LimitExcept GET POST OPTIONS> > >> </LimitExcept> > >> > >> is a useless section. > > > > Hi Bill, > > Obviously this post is ancient but its been bothering me since you posted it. > > > > I can't see any instances of Limit and LimitExcept combined in the > > manual (for trunk). > > Thank goodness! > > > That's from here presumably: > > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/docs/conf/extra/h ttpd-userdir.conf.in > > > > I don't know if I've the bits required to commit to that directory but > > in any case I don't feel comfortable doing so. Is this still an issue, > > then? > > Yes - it still seems like an issue to me. I see lots of abuse of this > style of coding. It's one bit-flag in a directory section, and that > bit-flag only modifies the require/order/satisfy directives - really > rather bogus. > > Bill > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
