* Eric Covener wrote: > On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 2:03 PM, Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 1:57 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > + <note type="warning"><title>Note</title> > > > + <p>This directive will be ignored in a name-based virtual > > > host context.</p> + </note> > > Useful to somehow clarify that if the connection matches a set of > NameVirtualHost's, the KeepAliveTimeout from the first defined vhost > in that set of NameVirtualhost's is used? I think it's still useful > to tweak in that context.
I agree that it would be generally desirable (it's a reference documentation after all). But I think, it's pretty hard to explain if we want to avoid confusion. People often don't even get the whole name based VH concept - that's my experience at least. Maybe we need some "expert knowledge" boxes or something. nd -- die (eval q-qq[Just Another Perl Hacker ] ;-) # André Malo, <http://www.perlig.de/> # --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
