* William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.2.9 are available at:
> >
> > http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> I've reviewed the result set of our roll release script, which axes all
> of the .xml/.xsl inputs, and this leftover group of files seem odd...
>
> httpd-2.2.9\manual\style\build.properties
> httpd-2.2.9\manual\style\common.dtd
> httpd-2.2.9\manual\style\faq.dtd
> httpd-2.2.9\manual\style\lang.dtd
> httpd-2.2.9\manual\style\manualpage.dtd
> httpd-2.2.9\manual\style\modulesynopsis.dtd
> httpd-2.2.9\manual\style\sitemap.dtd
> httpd-2.2.9\manual\style\version.ent
> httpd-2.2.9\manual\style\latex
> httpd-2.2.9\manual\style\latex\atbeginend.sty
>
> can someone confirm that all of these should be axed in an html result
> tree from our roll/release script? If so, I'll modify it.
confirmed.
>
> The only things I'm sure we want to retain under the manual/style
> tree are...
>
> httpd-2.2.9\manual\style\css
> httpd-2.2.9\manual\style\css\manual-chm.css
> httpd-2.2.9\manual\style\css\manual-loose-100pc.css
> httpd-2.2.9\manual\style\css\manual-print.css
> httpd-2.2.9\manual\style\css\manual-zip-100pc.css
> httpd-2.2.9\manual\style\css\manual-zip.css
> httpd-2.2.9\manual\style\css\manual.css
Well, for the pure (online) HTML distribution manual.css, manual-print.css
and manual-loose-100pc.css should be sufficient.
The *zip* CSS files are modifications for static distributions and the *chm*
file for the CHM build.
I suggest however to blacklist the (CSS) files you want to kick instead of
whitelisting the used ones. That way there's less room for mistakes :)
nd
--
"Solides und umfangreiches Buch"
-- aus einer Rezension
<http://pub.perlig.de/books.html#apache2>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
