* William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Tony Stevenson wrote: > > Agreed, this would seem to be the simplest and cleanest solution. > > I'm not sure mucking about with language negotiation will offer us > > other than additional headaches. > > > > Then using ForceType will likely cause some browsers to make a right > > royal hash of it all. IE8 for example, refuses to display > > foo.png.tr(.utf8) instead offering to give me it's traditional red x. > > Keep in mind, too, that rendering these from the file system, our > inverted file types are a real headache. Ending in .png as suggested, > or .html or whatnot is far more rational, and the original convention was > certainly a flaw from the point of view of a browser reading our content > locally. For local viewing we've got the localized archives anyway. I think, that should be fine. nd --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
