On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Nick Kew<[email protected]> wrote: > > On 21 Jul 2009, at 08:57, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > >> Folks, this looks out of whack. >> >> I'm a big fan of Tim's contributions, but this is not an Apache httpd >> module. This information belongs at the httpd project wiki as much >> as PHP or mod_cluster do, which is to say, it doesn't seem to. > > Perhaps the wiki could/should have a section for third-party > modules? Complete with $big-disclaimer. +1
When a 3rd party module doesn't work or behave badly the complaints and help request tend to have a way to make it over here regardless if it's our problem or not. So having some info handy seems like a good idea, even if it's minimal info at best. > The comparison with PHP doesn't really work, because > everyone knows about it, and they don't need our help > to find out about it. > > -- > Nick Kew > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
