Dan Poirier wrote: > On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 09:51 -0500, "William A. Rowe, Jr." > <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote: >> Dan Poirier wrote: >>> After updating some of the .xml files in the docs and rebuilding, a >>> number of other files get updated by the build. Should I check all >>> of these in as well? Just some of them? >>> >>> (I looked for some guidance at http://httpd.apache.org/docs-project/ >>> but didn't see anything.) >> If svn status shows they changed, you should, but need to determine if >> this is a legit change or a byproduct of some library dependency that >> changed. >> >> I'd really like to avoid us ping-ponging between two different flavors >> of some xml transformation libraries' interpretations of our xslt, for >> example. > > I'll check, but I think most of these seemed reasonable results of the > .xml changes. > > Why do we check in things like the .html files, though, since they can > be recreated by a build?
The build toolchain is not a requirement for building or releasing. It could be, though. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: docs-h...@httpd.apache.org
