https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50730
Igor Galić <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO --- Comment #1 from Igor Galić <[email protected]> 2011-02-28 14:25:35 EST --- """Using a type map (i.e., a *.var file) which names the files containing the variants explicitly, or""" and then: """Type map files should have the same name as the resource which they are describing, and have an entry for each available variant; these entries consist of contiguous HTTP-format header lines.""" If that is not clear enough, can you suggest a better phrasing? For one, for the other: We then go on to describe the multitude of things you can pack into a single .var file -- I'm not quite clear how from these two pieces of information you were able to interpret that: a) type-maps can be placed in arbitrary directories (How then should they be mapped to the requested resources?) b) There can be more than one type-map ...sure there can be.. but that would be silly... You could for instance create # foo.en.var: URI: foo.en.html Content-Encoding: text/html URI: foo.en.xhtml Content-Encoding: text/xhtml # foo.fr.var: URI: foo.fr.html Content-Encoding: text/html URI: foo.fr.xhtml Content-Encoding: text/xhtml But that seems silly, since you can vary on all that within the same type-map: # foo.var: URI: foo.en.html Content-Language: en Content-Type: text/html URI: foo.en.xhtml Content-Language: en Content-Type: text/xhtml URI: foo.fr.html Content-Language: fr Content-Type: text/html URI: foo.fr.xhtml Content-Language: fr Content-Type: text/xhtml -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
