On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Rich Bowen <rbo...@rcbowen.com> wrote: > > On Nov 17, 2011, at 2:27 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > > e.g., proxy-balancer needs slotmem-shm* > > in 2.4 this is a lot less obvious than proxy-http needs proxy > > *a more complex and correct explanation is certainly possible, but > down near the surface of the earth it needs to be clear that in > general you need to also load X in order to use Y > > We do not. It would be really helpful to have that as an item in the > standard module doc head along with Description and Status.
The dictionary entry for Dependency could explain the different types of dependencies -- explicit module vs provider. I'm struggling with what exactly to declare for provider-type dependencies. List the group, which links to a section of some provider overview page that shows the bundled implementers of that group? Or just explicitly list the bundled modules? > Are there cases > where a diagram would be more useful than just listing dependencies? It might save some time when planning a highly-customized build to look at a table or chart or ???. (better for the wiki perhaps) > > > -- > Rich Bowen > rbo...@rcbowen.com :: @rbowen > rbo...@apache.org > > > > > -- Born in Roswell... married an alien... --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: docs-h...@httpd.apache.org
