On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 09:36:18AM -0400, Rich Bowen wrote: > It has been mentioned several times that we'd have more translations if we'd > relax the review policy a little. > > I'd like to propose that we loosen it up on trunk, so that the translations > can at least get into the tree, and then actively solicit reviews (on users@, > for example) before pushing them into trunk. I think that by requiring review > of the patches, rather than putting them into trunk, we make it unreasonably > hard for reviewers to actually have a look at them. Whereas if they were in > trunk, reviewers could look at the rendered docs on the /docs/trunk web site, > and we'd be more likely to get feedback. > > Thoughts? > I think we'd be ok to skip the review for translated docs in trunk as long as we stick to our current model of getting a second set of trusted eyes on it before backporting. But I don't think it's a good idea to go fishing for reviews at random spots like users@.
vh Mads Toftum -- http://soulfood.dk --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: docs-h...@httpd.apache.org
