> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 8:05 AM, Jeff Trawick <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Eric Covener <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Igor Galić <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>>> I nuked the EBCDIC doc, because it is clearly so far out of date as >>>>> to be harmful. However, it occurred to me that this was probably >>>>> premature, before discussing it here, and I reverted. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I was hoping someone could advise as to what we should do with that >>>>> document. I suspect that nuking it, and making a short mention of >>>>> EBCDIC elsewhere, might indeed be the right approach, but it wasn't >>>>> right for me to just do that unilaterally. >>>> >>>> I'd move the whole thing to the developer docs. >>> >>> +1, with a banner saying they're likely outdated. >> >> Delete it. Most of it is developer information, but it is hopelessly >> out of date; the end user information is minimal (and doesn't help at >> all if moving to the developer docs).
+1 >> >> EBCDIC deserves a small writeup when somebody gets around to it, but >> this is not a useful basis. > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
