On Monday 30 April 2012, Rich Bowen wrote: > Hmm. I think I misread. are we talking about the website, or the > product documentation? > > The former, I can see an advantage to, but the latter I might take > some convincing. We ship those docs with the product, so > maintaining them in the CMS might not be the best service to our > users. --
FWIW, the documentation shipped in the tarball would greatly benefit from not using typemaps and content negotiation. The current format is a PITA to view directly with a browser. And if you have a problem that makes httpd fail to start, you are out of luck. Unless you can access the copy on httpd.apache.org - but why then ship the docs in the tarball in the first place? In Debian, we already ship the docs in a standalone format (converted with a perl search and replace script). But having some XSLT magic that does the right thing would be much nicer. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: docs-h...@httpd.apache.org
