----- Original Message ----- > > On 3 May 2012, at 14:54, Rich Bowen wrote: > > > I've long been a fan of the PHP documentation - specifically, the > > way that they solicit commentary from readers, and then fold that > > commentary into the docs. Not only did it encourage me to comment > > on the docs, it also got me involved in the PHP documentation > > project, at least marginally. The barrier to entry is so low that > > all you have to do is be a writer. > > I introduced a comment mechanism at apachetutor, only to find a > predominance of spam over > anything worth having (a very occasional worthwhile comment or > question that provoked me > to update something). There's also an annoying-spam issue on our > httpd wiki. > > How does PHP documentation deal with the problem of spam?
I don't know how PHP deals with spam, but disqus has a number of ways: http://docs.disqus.com/help/48/ > -- > Nick Kew i -- Igor Galić Tel: +43 (0) 664 886 22 883 Mail: i.ga...@brainsware.org URL: http://brainsware.org/ GPG: 6880 4155 74BD FD7C B515 2EA5 4B1D 9E08 A097 C9AE --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: docs-h...@httpd.apache.org
