On 12/4/2013 3:06 PM, Eric Covener wrote: > If a module in the 2.4.x doc has inherited a compatibility tag of > "first available in 2.3.x", should we > > [ ] leave it > [ ] wipe it entirely > [ ] change it to 2.4.0 to give an indication it's new in this release? > > I am split between 2 and 3.
Leaving it as-is should be fine. Although few, those versions do exist and it's more useful to know exactly when something was added than to guess. I think everyone is capable of recognizing that 2.3.x < 2.4.x ... unless the goal is to deny the existence of the odd-number versions. In that case, I'd say 3. -- Daniel Ruggeri --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: docs-h...@httpd.apache.org
