On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 7:34 AM, Hollstein, Mathias
<mathias.hollst...@destatis.de> wrote:
> Hello Eric,
>
> so I can safely assume that when using "%{VARNAME}C" for .e.g. like
> (below) it does the trick/causes serious pain to me?
yes
> # CustomLog with format nickname
> LogFormat "%h %l %u %t \"%r\" %>s %b \"%{mycookie-name}i\"" common
> CustomLog logs/access_log common
s/i/C
>
>
> Can I also assume the documents (current) are perfectly fine since
> "CookieLog Directive" does not have to be specified anymore like
> "CookieLog 'filename'", but the imply is active "automagically" and can
> be used like described above?
I don't think when "CookieLog" did anything it had anything to do with
individual format strings used by the rest of mod_log_config.
> So this essentially mean I have to go through the configs and look for
> such \"%{mycookie-name}i\" statements, right?
"C", not "i"
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-h...@httpd.apache.org
