Le 05/04/2014 17:03, Eric Covener a écrit :
> On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Lucien Gentis
> <lucien.gen...@univ-lorraine.fr> wrote:
>> Hello everybody,
>>
>> In flags.xml - trunk branch - line 99 :
>>
>> <p>An alternative to this flag is using a <directive module="mod_rewrite"
>>> RewriteCond</directive> to capture against %{THE_REQUEST} which will
>> capture
>> strings in the encoded form.</p>
>>
>> I don't understand the meaning of "to capture against %{THE_REQUEST}".
> If you capture something with a normal rewriterule, it has already been
> decoded.
> If you capture against %{THE_REQUEST} in a rewritecond, it's still
> escaped as the client originally sent it.
>
> So if you have some problem where not specifying [B] is broken, and
> specifying [B] is also broken, you can often avoid the backref
> escaping issue by capturing %{THE_REQUEST} in a condition and using
> %1.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: docs-h...@httpd.apache.org
>
Thanks Eric, your answer is very clear.
Lucien
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-h...@httpd.apache.org
