https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57778
--- Comment #3 from sebast...@pipping.org --- (In reply to Eric Covener from comment #2) > thanks for the report. I've added a note in trunk and 2.4 about the legacy > type-as-handler stuff. Thanks for your work on this matter. I found the related commit at r1675426: https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1675426 To be honest, I find the note rather hard to understand, even _with_ a background of having understood what's going on to some extent prior to reading. And there is no mention of potential danger / security. I'd provide a patch if I knew how to put it well. Quoting a public mail of yours, "If no handler is explicitly set, the content-type is copied over as the handler." put it much more clearly. Besides: * there is a typo "diretives", * some double quotes may need conversion to """ (not sure) and * for "magic" I would use "artificial", instead. My vote for re-opening, please. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: docs-h...@httpd.apache.org