https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57109

Luca Toscano <toscano.l...@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |INVALID

--- Comment #2 from Luca Toscano <toscano.l...@gmail.com> ---
Hi!

>From https://www.gnupg.org/documentation/manpage.html it seems that we are ok:

"""
–verify [[=sigfile=] [=signed-files=]]
Assume that sigfile is a signature and verify it without generating any output.
With no arguments, the signature packet is read from stdin (it may be a
detached signature when not used in batch mode). If only a sigfile is given, it
may be a complete signature or a detached signature, in which case the signed
stuff is expected in a file without the ".sig" or ".asc" extension (if such a
file does not exist it is expected at stdin; use a single dash ("-") as
filename to force a read from stdin). With more than 1 argument, the first
should be a detached signature and the remaining files are the signed stuff.
"""

From: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/verification.html

"In this example, you are already assumed to have downloaded
httpd-2.0.44.tar.gz (the release) and httpd-2.0.44.tar.gz.asc (the detached
signature)."

Closing this bug, please re-open it if I missed something!

Luca

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-h...@httpd.apache.org

Reply via email to