Not sure 18mons after EOL whether we want to declare httpd 2.2 docs
"closed/archived" much like 1.3 and 2.0, in which case there is no reason
to refresh the copyright date.

Thoughts?

On Jan 4, 2018 5:03 AM, "Luca Toscano" <elu...@apache.org> wrote:

>
>
> 2018-01-03 19:35 GMT+01:00 Luca Toscano <elu...@apache.org>:
>
>> Hi everybody!
>>
>> 2018-01-03 19:24 GMT+01:00 <elu...@apache.org>:
>>
>>> Author: elukey
>>> Date: Wed Jan  3 18:24:57 2018
>>> New Revision: 1819994
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1819994&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> common.xsl: update year to 2018 in the footer
>>>
>>> Modified:
>>>     httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/style/xsl/common.xsl
>>>
>>> Modified: httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/style/xsl/common.xsl
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/s
>>> tyle/xsl/common.xsl?rev=1819994&r1=1819993&r2=1819994&view=diff
>>> ============================================================
>>> ==================
>>> --- httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/style/xsl/common.xsl (original)
>>> +++ httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/style/xsl/common.xsl Wed Jan  3
>>> 18:24:57 2018
>>> @@ -418,7 +418,7 @@ var comments_identifier = 'http://httpd.
>>>  </xsl:choose>
>>>  <div id="footer">&lf;
>>>      <p class="apache">
>>> -        <xsl:text>Copyright 2017 The Apache Software
>>> Foundation.</xsl:text><br />
>>> +        <xsl:text>Copyright 2018 The Apache Software
>>> Foundation.</xsl:text><br />
>>>          <xsl:if test="normalize-space($message[@id='before-license'])">
>>>              <xsl:value-of select="$message[@id='before-license']"/>
>>>              <xsl:text> </xsl:text>
>>>
>>
>>
>> I'd tried a ./build.sh all and all our docs seem to get the new year
>> value correctly, but before committing the docs update I am wondering if
>> this is the correct procedure or not (especially for translations) since
>> I've never done it.
>>
>>
> Updated trunk with http://svn.apache.org/r1820055, I'll wait a bit to see
> if anybody comes up with any comment and if not I'll proceed with 2.4/2.2 :)
>
> Luca
>
>

Reply via email to