On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 9:35 AM Joe Orton <jor...@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 10:08:12AM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> > Le 19/08/2020 à 09:47, Joe Orton a écrit :
> > > Stupid question, why do we need to change the suffix to .utf8 to
> convert
> > > these files into UTF-8?
> >
> > I don't think it is needed, just a matter of consistancy in naming.
> > See r1878788 to see the magic needed to concert to UTF-8 (without
> renaming
> > files)
>
> [Adding docs@ to CC.]
>
> Shall we move everything (except for Korean?) to UTF-8 and drop the
> .utf8 suffix as well?  It would still be consistent then.


Why not Korean? It maps very well to utf-8, similar to Japanese it has a
basic
phonetic alphabet, but borrows a significant number of Han (Hangul in
Koreans)
characters from the CJK set.

Reply via email to