https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60377
--- Comment #2 from Philippe Cloutier <[email protected]> --- Greetings Rich, (In reply to Rich Bowen from comment #1) > I don't think this is accurate. per-directory rules can also be defined in > <Directory> sections, and the behavior is the same as for .htaccess files. This bug is caused specifically by <Directory> context. The behavior is the same *as long as it is considered relative to the target directory* (as opposed to the definition directory). > When I used that specific phrasing, the assumption I'm making is that they > are defined in a .htaccess file or a <Directory> block. Otherwise they are > not "per-directory rules", by the definition that is being used by the doc. That's correct. > Now, I am sure that this could be made clearer, but the rephrasing you've > suggested here feels less clear, rather than more clear to me. The point was accuracy, and I agree my suggestion was not the clearest. I have not looked at the documentation for years, but I guess "The directory path for which the rule is defined" would be both accurate and clear. License: All my contributions to this ticket (including comments and attachments) without a copyright notice are offered under the terms of CC0 1.0 (unless otherwise indicated). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
