Le 31/05/2026 à 13:48, Rich Bowen a écrit :
On Sat, May 30, 2026, 18:33 Rich Bowen <[email protected]> wrote:
I’ve gone ahead and patched trunk, but note that this means I’ve
also patched the build/ repo, so I need to go ahead and patch 2.4
pretty soon, or things will be kinda broken in the meanwhile.
https://validator.w3.org/nu/?doc=https%3A%2F%2Fhttpd.apache.org%2Fdocs%2Ftrunk%2Fbind.html
We're down to one warning and one error, and neither one of them
particularly concern me. I'll push this over to 2.4 today or tomorrow.
Note that there's related problems with the httpd-site repo but since
that site is generated completely differently I haven't looked at that
yet. I expect it's related but that the fix will be different.
I tested trunk :
=== TESTING ===
1. Apply patch, rebuild one language: ./build.sh en
./build.sh validate-xml : OK
./build.sh fr : OK
./build.sh validate-xhtml : OK
2. Inspect generated .html — verify DOCTYPE is HTML5
First two lines of bind.html.fr.utf8 :
<!DOCTYPE html SYSTEM"about:legacy-compat">
<html lang="fr"><head><META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=UTF-8">
3. Run: java -jar vnu.jar --skip-non-html ../bind.html.en.utf8
Ran directly ./build.sh validate-xhtml : OK
4. Confirm void elements are not self-closed (<br> not <br/>)
No <br/> found in manual directory
5. Spot-check pages render identically in browser
I committed bind.html.fr.utf8, didn’t see any rendering problem.
All things seem to be OK
Great job Rich !
