I believe it is also advised to make the mapped properties of your Entities "protected" instead of "private". Can't reproduce the reason right now, but better check it in the documentation...
Cheers! On Feb 13, 2014 11:59 AM, "Jess Rowbottom" <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thursday, 13 February 2014 10:47:06 UTC, Jàπ (Jasper N. Brouwer) wrote: > > > Yes, when you have a bidirectional association, the owning sides needs >> an `inversedBy` and the inversed side needs a `mappedBy`. >> >> The value of `inversedBy` and `mappedBy` should be the name of the >> property you're pointing to (not a class-name or column-name). >> > > Yeah. I think the issue I had was that I was confused by that bit - the > documentation had the column names, and the entity attributes the same, so > that's where the confusion came in. I've inherited a legacy dataset which I > needed to reverse engineer and establish some relationships hence why > column names are different to the attribute names in most cases. > > All sorted. Thankyou very much for the pointers and assistance! > > jx > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "doctrine-user" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/doctrine-user. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "doctrine-user" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/doctrine-user. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
