Thanks Christophe.
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 6:37 PM, Christophe COEVOET <[email protected]> wrote: > Le 02/07/2014 15:57, Nima Sadjadi a écrit : > > Thanks a lot Christophe, >> Is there any advantage and/or performance increase using QueryBuilder >> instead of using dql directly? or this is just for developer convenience? >> >> There is no real performance change (well, at level of > micro-optimisations, providing the string directly in the source code will > be faster than doing a building with concatenation, but this is totally > negligeable compared to the query execution). > > the main advantage of the QueryBuilder is that you have an object-oriented > builder, allowing to reuse your building logic (you can pass the builder to > a method adding some filtering), while doing the same with DQL strings > would require doing weird string replacements (and likely buggy). > > > -- > Christophe | Stof > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "doctrine-user" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/doctrine-user. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "doctrine-user" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/doctrine-user. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
