Did the operation actually initialize the collection? Consider that
EXTRA_LAZY behavior changed in master. Is the query actually that slow?

Marco Pivetta

http://twitter.com/Ocramius

http://ocramius.github.com/


On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 8:03 PM, Nelson Teixeira <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Well, in my question at Stackoverflow, I explain.
>
> Acctually the idea here is only a suggestion that may be helpful to the
> delopment team. Like a report on a way to improve. I´m not familiar with
> the Doctrine source code and from my point of view it should be only a
> special case for isEmpty Collection method. If it's a EXTRA_LAZY
> association then it could just get 1 record only and check with exists,
> instead of fetching the whole collection as it is now or using count() > 0.
>  In my tests to test isEmpty without fetching collection I obtained 243ms
> using count(*) > 0 over 12ms of less using select exists(select id from
> associatedTable WHERE mainId = [something] limit 1).
> I tested this because what I want is ony to have a class property/method
> to check if there are associated records or not.
> If it's too complex, foget it then. Sorry :)
>
> -Nelson
>
> 2014-07-18 12:11 GMT-03:00 Marco Pivetta
>
>> Counting over an indexed association should be quite fast anyway.
>>
>> Are you sure there is an actual gain for introducing that much complexity?
>>
>> Marco Pivetta
>>
>> http://twitter.com/Ocramius
>>
>> http://ocramius.github.com/
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 5:08 PM, Nelson Teixeira <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello, based on this Stackoverflow question/answer:
>>>
>>>
>>> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/24825047/doctrine-custom-form-field-based-on-query
>>>
>>> I would like to bring an ideia to the development team in using
>>>
>>> select exists(select * from associated_table where id_main_table =
>>> <whatever> limit 1)
>>>
>>> in isEmpty() for EXTRA_LAZY associations.
>>>
>>> The current functionality is it would fetch the whole collection when
>>> called.
>>>
>>> Based on my tests the performace gain on using it over count() > 0 would
>>> be 20x faster.
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "doctrine-user" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/doctrine-user.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>>  --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "doctrine-user" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/doctrine-user.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "doctrine-user" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/doctrine-user.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"doctrine-user" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/doctrine-user.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to