Hi all, On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 8:50 AM, Michele Zarri <[email protected]> wrote: > On 27 October 2010 14:45, Nino Novak <[email protected]> wrote: >> Just downloaded Chapter 1, Introducing LibreOffice, from the wiki, >> http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Documentation >> >> The links in the URLs seem to have been forgotten to migrate: though >> they are labeled http://LibreOffice (which indicates they have been not >> converted properly, presumably because the replacement oo.o -> LibO was >> not done case sensitive) the underlying links are still pointing to >> openoffice.org sites. >> >> So if somebody continues to migrate documents, be careful to take care >> also of the links :-) >> >> BTW, where is the ToDo-List for such little tasks? >> How about starting to use the bug tracker? >> Any experiences? >> >> Nino >> >> -- >> E-mail to [email protected] for instructions on how to >> unsubscribe >> List archives are available at >> http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/documentation/ >> All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be >> deleted >> >> > > Hello Nino, > > Once OOoAuthors have completed their current project of updating all > the existing user guides to OOo3.2.1, to which I am contributing, it > is my intention to dedicate more time to libreoffice.org
Great and thanks :) > > The idea of using a bug tracker is great. > Maybe not needed for the problem you identified (these mistakes are > generally corrected during the revision process) but to create new > "features" requests or enhancements as LibO moves from version 3.3 to > future releases and new functionality is made available. > > Unfortunately I have no experience in this area (besides filing bugs) > but it would help to have a documentation category in the bug tracker. > This never happened with OOo because the OOoAuthors produced user > guides are not an organic part of the project and setting up a > bugzilla for the documentation only is a bit of an overkill. > > I think this is one of the most attractive aspects of LibO compared to > OOo (in the documentation area): the chance for the documentation > besides the online help to be a rightful and integrated part of the > project. Yes and the online help will need also the input of the documentation project I think. I would really like to see a way to make it more available to authors and easier to maintain out of the product, even if the translation workflow stays a part of the product. Kind regards Sophie -- Founding member of The Document Foundation -- E-mail to [email protected] for instructions on how to unsubscribe List archives are available at http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/documentation/ All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
