On Friday 05 November 2010 21:43, Marc Paré wrote: > Le 2010-11-05 16:06, Nino Novak a écrit : > > On Friday 05 November 2010 20:21, Marc Paré wrote: > > [...] I was just trying > to comment that we were actually the people building the tool and it > would be quite the opportunity here to better fine tune our tool in > this process while the document team had a direct feed to the devs.
not sure what you mean by having "a direct feed to the devs" (I'm not a native speaker so sometimes I have to ask for better understanding, sorry) I think we should roughly catch requirements, then ASAP pick and provide appropriate tools and start working as soon as possible. Fine tuning can be done successively, as all parties will be learning by doing. Call it prototyping or similar, I'm not an expert here. > What better way to prove that your tool if built for complete > document production from start to finish. The tool has to be adequate/appropriate. For Internet collaboration, mere ODF is not (yet) good enough, wiki and web are far more appropriate. But nonetheless, it's a challenge to set up appropriate workflows and supportive tools (and BTW that's one of the reasons for me to participate here). > But I understand that there are time and schedule constraints to > meet. Don't forget that we are setting our constraints ourselves :-) N. -- E-mail to [email protected] for instructions on how to unsubscribe List archives are available at http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/documentation/ All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
