2011/1/16 Tom Davies <[email protected]> > Hi :) > > I agree. > > However, we sometimes focus tooo much on extremely rare and unlikely > situations. This seems to make non-linux users think that we always have > to use > one of those complicated methods. I have had an offlist chat with someone > from > here who had a brief try at linux. He always used the complicated methods > because he never found the gui package managers. > > Hmm, i am not sure about expecting documentation to be 100% up-to-date. > Sometimes examples have to be given of specific releases but usually > documentation 'should' make that clear and show which part might need > tweaking > if used on subsequent releases. Also i don't expect documentation to be > 100% > good english. That is partly because we all use English slightly > differently. > Different towns, different social groups, different professions all use > different vocabulary and different sentence structures. We aim somewhere > near > perfection and that works well. > > > Anyway the main point was that your documentation was good and will be > useful. > I enjoyed proof-reading it (unlike some people's writings!) but i think > someone > a bit more technical might need to tidy up the areas you said were > incomplete. > I didn't thoroughly test the process you described but it looked about > right at > a skim through. I was more interested in quickly sorting grammar, spelling > and > sundry pedantic stuff like that :) All was good before but is hopefully a > little better now :) > > Thanks and regards from > Tom :) > > Thanks again :)
Rogerio -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/documentation/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
