Hi :) Yes, fix things yourself is the main plan. No need to discuss anything beforehand really, except perhaps whatever you consider to be serious changes. It might be easier to make even serious changes as you go and then mention those changes to the list. What is serious and what is not is "a moving target" at the moment but you will get a good feel for what people are comfortable with fairly soon so don't worry :)
I think if you are proof-reading and complete a page then you publish it? I think that even after publishing people can still correct it and re-publish? Regards from Tom :) ________________________________ From: John M. Dlugosz <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Sat, 5 February, 2011 4:46:09 Subject: [libreoffice-documentation] Alfresco Workflow Questions Documents are edited, reviewed, proofed, and proofed again. So what am I supposed to do in the 'review' or 'proof' stage? Fix things myself? I think that serious content problems would get a 'comment' and sent back to drafts; likewise something that needs discussion. But typos, small formatting nits, and punctuation? Easier to fix than to explain! Do I make such changes with change-tracking turned on and let the next proofer vet it? -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/documentation/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity *** -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/documentation/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
