On 2/19/2011 4:43 PM, JDługosz wrote:
I should point out that it doesn't have to be reviewed by one person or all
at once.
Anyone can flip through some of a chapter and double-check and accept all
the typo fixes and formatting fixes, like stray letters that have been set
as Times New Roman and wonky margins and misspelled words. Then put it back
for someone else to look at later.
If all the easy changes are reviewed and the only thing left are subject to
discussion, then say so in the discussion thread. Note that things I've
flagged as needing work are Comments, not Changes, so they will just sit
there along for the ride until they are addressed. No need to take those
out!
As for the chapter dealing with Options, there are I think 2 or so places
where "select" was used in a sentence that was really wrong. The rest of
them, that I changed systematically, could be rejected until further
discussion. But, is my rewording any worse than the original?
--John
As you've seen, there is some definite disagreement with the use of enable/disable, so I think those
changes should probably be rejected for now while we get the first edition out.
As for the more time-consuming changes, I think moving the files elsewhere with those comments, and
"rejecting" them for now in the working set, would make it easier for the remaining reviewers
(second proof and publication) to deal with the files. Probably not a biggie, though.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to documentation+h...@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/documentation/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
