On Sun, 2011-06-19 at 19:12 -0400, Gary Schnabl wrote: > On 6/19/2011 7:07 PM, Jean Hollis Weber wrote: > > On Sun, 2011-06-19 at 14:11 -0400, Gary Schnabl wrote: > > > >> (3) The template exposition suggests that the user could employ AutoText > >> for subsequent insertion of the Tip-type tables. I already incorporated > >> AutoText entries for those tables directly into the template, therefore > >> making it unnecessary for any users to waste their time when needlessly > >> creating those AutoText entries themselves. > > I was not aware that AutoText entries become part of a template. In > > fact, I am sure that they do not. I would be delighted to be proven > > wrong, as it would save a lot of hassle. > > > > Same for Table AutoFormats, among other things. > > > > --Jean > > I thought that I had incorporated those AutoText entries for such tables > already a few months ago--probably in January or February--in one or > more of my own versions of the OOo chapter template. I might have posted > them on the ODF website, or maybe I did not...
Are you sure the AutoText entries becomes part of the template? As I said above, I don't think they do. But I don't have time to test this. --Jean -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
