Dennis, thanks for the clarification. I tend to use the word "code" as shorthand for a whole cluster of things that are more technical than I ever get involved in.
I did know that OASIS is about standards, not implementation code, but IMO few if any people who aren't into code in some form (e.g. macros in depth) would get involved in standards for a format. --Jean On Sun, 2011-06-19 at 18:30 -0700, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > I want to erase a misconception. OASIS is a standards development > organization. Their work products are specifications, not code. The closest > to code are schemas (in Relax NG in the case of ODF) for the XML structures > that carry the ODF document representation. > Jean Hollis Weber wrote, > I personally don't see any reason why ODFAuthors should be involved with > OASIS; we are documenters, not coders. Any interested individuals who > happen to be involved with ODFAuthors should also be involved with other > groups that are more relevant. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
