Hi :) I don't know about using meta names. Cutting names to things like GS34-ChapterTitleinCamelCase.odt(/pdf) makes a lot of sense to me. If meta-tags would be clearer then that sounds good. Regards from Tom :)
________________________________ From: Jean Hollis Weber <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Tue, 2 August, 2011 11:38:44 Subject: Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Updating user guides to LibO 3.4.2 On Tue, 2011-08-02 at 12:41 +0300, David Nelson wrote: > Hi Jean, > > On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Jean Hollis Weber <[email protected]> wrote: > > AFAIK, unless the filenames are different between the 3.3.x and 3.4.x > > versions of a chapter, they cannot both be stored on the wiki. Whatever > > is the latest upload will overwrite the other. > > ... maybe we could just add > a summary differentiation, e.g. GS34-ChapterTitle.odt rather than > 0101GS34-ChapterTitle.odt... That's fine with me. I've been thinking about dropping the first 4 digits anyway. > > What do you think about the general principle of preferring the meta > data as a medium of storing info rather than file names? Sounds fine to me. --Jean -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
