Hi :) For screen-shots the vast majority of the docs team back then decided to try to be consistent but a couple of us quite liked the idea of using a variety of themes. It would look messy and 'unprofessional' unless done in a structured artistic way (very time consuming) and anyway the rest of the team was against the idea. The decision to be consistent wasn't agreed by consensus but was a vast majority which is cool :)
We settled on one theme but then Jean found an even better one that looked almost identical on all distros and even in Windows for the odd screen-shots needed there. So the switch to the "Ubuntu XP-Silver" theme made sense. Should we discuss this again and perhaps select different theme(s) for 3.4 or can we keep going with what was agreed for 3.3.x? I'm happy either way but i had to fight hard in steering-discuss for the documentation team's decision even tho i had originally been against it. David had a similar experience in the Branding lists & then steering-discuss too. However, if the team wants to make the 3.4.x series documentation deliberately different from the 3.3.x then a few suggestions about now would be great. I have a really bad feeling that i might have "beaten people into submission", or forced them into doing something they hate. So i would really appreciate feedback from other members of the team even if that confirms my fears. Regards from Tom :) -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
